On March 21, 2019, a major explosion occurred at the Jiangsu Tianjiayi Chemical Co., Ltd. Publicly available safety and environmental violation records suggest that JTC was an accident waiting to happen. IPE contacted four chemical companies who appeared from public records to be customers of JTC – DowDupont, BASF, Clariant, and Merck. However, these chemical giants are not trying to participate in the multi-stakeholder efforts; instead, they are still trying to shy away from their responsibilities.

October 25, 2018 – The Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE) published the fifth annual Green Supply Chain CITI (Corporate Information Transparency Index) evaluation report in Beijing. The report shows that environmental big data generates innovative solutions to help leading multinational and local brands develop green procurement on a greater scale.

In August 2018, environmental groups conducted an investigation on environmental pollution in Starbucks cup supply chains. They sent a letter to inquire as to whether Starbucks knew of the environmental violations of its straw cup and accompanying cup suppliers, and to advocate for rectification and public explanation. To date, Starbucks has yet to respond. A cup might seem the same, one that comes from clean production versus one whose production pollutes the environment, but their impact on health and the environment may be vastly different. We hope that Starbucks can make a meaningful change to provide consumers with truly green products.

The investigative report issued by IPE and Lüse Jiangnan on May 21st highlighted that Xiaomi has long avoided addressing pollution along its supply chain for the past four year. The report also drew attention to one of its suppliers Ichia, which was found with suspected violation. According to the Taiwanese media, Ichia Technologies, Inc.(Code: 2402) has been suspended for trading on June 29th following an announcement that the production of Ichia Suzhou has been put on halt.

On June 21st 2018, Xiaomi Corporation released Post Hearing Information Pack (1st submission) (full version) via Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited website. Xiaomi admitted that ‘certain current suppliers of the Group have experienced historical environmental non-compliance incidents’ and that ‘non-compliance of our suppliers with relevant environmental laws and regulations may cause disruptions to our product supply to users, increase our cost of sales and have a material and adverse impact on our business operations and financial results.’

On June 14th 2018, Xiaomi Corporation Draft prospectus for Depository Receipt Public Offerings was published via China Securities Regulatory Commission website. In the prospectus, Xiaomi admitted for the first time that its current suppliers have experienced historical environmental non-compliance incidents.

In May 2018, environmental groups IPE and Lüse Jiangnan completed another round of investigations into pollution in Xiaomi’s supply chain, finding that pollution has become even more severe. Groups once again raised these issues to Xiaomi, but still only received silence and avoidance in response. Meanwhile, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) – where Xiaomi is seeking its IPO – has made clear requirements for ESG-related disclosure. We believe that Xiaomi is in violation of HKEX's relevant requirements for information disclosure.