One company (603662.SH) was fined RMB 476,000 after its subsidiary began project operations without completing environmental acceptance procedures and was found to have more air pollutant discharge outlets than permitted. Another (603588.SH) received a RMB 600,000 penalty after its subsidiary exceeded regulatory limits for total arsenic concentration in wastewater discharges. During the third and fourth weeks of April 2025, which listed companies fell short of their environmental and information disclosure responsibilities? Find out in Issue 197 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

For discharging wastewater into the environment, 688057.SH was fined RMB 280,000; for improper pollutant discharge, a subsidiary of 002840.SZ received a fine of RMB 296,000. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure during the second week of April 2025? Find out in Issue No. 196 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

For interfering with automatic monitoring equipment while discharging pollutants, 688101.SH was fined RMB 625,000; for commencing construction without obtaining environmental impact assessment approval, 600011.SH received a fine of RMB 464,000. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure during the first week of April 2025? Find out in Issue No. 195 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

For discharging water pollutants in excess of permitted limits, a subsidiary of 600187.SH was fined RMB 400,000. For putting project-related environmental protection facilities into operation without passing acceptance inspection, 002128.SZ received a fine of RMB 350,000. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure during the third and fourth weeks of March 2025? Find out in Issue No. 194 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

For constructing before approval, putting environmental protection facilities into operation before completion, and failing to establish and maintain a hazardous waste management ledger as required by national regulations, a subsidiary of 600361.SH was fined approximately RMB 440,000. For providing waste organic solvents to a company without a proper license, a subsidiary of 600056.SH received a fine of approximately RMB 670,000. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure in the second week of March 2025? Find out in Issue No. 193 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

For falsifying emission test results or issuing false emission inspection reports, two subsidiaries of 603528.SH were fined a total of RMB 268,000. For exceeding the permitted annual emission limits, a subsidiary of 300428.SZ received a fine of RMB 232,000. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure in the first week of March 2025? Find out in Issue No. 192 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.

Discharging wastewater with arsenic concentrations exceeding regulatory limits—an incident classified as a major environmental emergency—a subsidiary of 603588.SH was fined RMB 1 million. For failing to comply with required monitoring frequencies and related obligations, a wholly owned sub-subsidiary of 300008.SZ was fined RMB 160,600. Which listed companies raised red flags in environmental compliance and information disclosure between the third and fourth weeks of February 2025? Find out in Issue No. 191 of the A-Share Green Weekly Report.