26.78
Total Possible Score: 10056
Out of 648 total brands2
Out of 24 total brands in the Industrial Chemicals industry26.40
Total Possible Score: 100152
Out of 1000 total brands14
Out of 35 total brands in the Industrial Chemicals industryBrand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and the frequency of communication with stakeholders occurs more often than quarterly, OR Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and employs the automatic reporting form provided by the Blue EcoChain or equivalent systems to communicate with stakeholders about green supply chain management.
Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually and the list includes higher environmental impact suppliers; OR Brand pushes its suppliers in China, including suppliers with high environmental impacts, to use the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track their own environmental performance and commit to provide public disclosures regarding violations in a timely manner, thereby accepting public supervision
Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance.
Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to pushing problem suppliers to adopt corrective actions and at least publicly disclose explanations about their environmental violation issues.
Brand extends its environmental management to chemical production, use and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.
Brand extends its environmental management to wastewater generation, treatment and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.
Brand extends its environmental management to solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.
Brand has not yet publicly disclosed its green logistics requirement.
Brand has not yet taken action to push its suppliers to control environmental risks along their own supply chains.
Brand begins to calculate its greenhouse gas emissions, or publicly discloses its ongoing emissions reduction targets, or begins to manage emissions from its supply chain.
Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and efficiency, and pollutant reduction target(s) and the progress made against these targets.
Brand guides the public to make green choices by publicly disclosing its efforts to dynamically manage the environmental impacts along its supply chain and product life cycle.
The total score of category 3.2 is 12, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (17%), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets(17%) and Climate Action (42%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.