Subsidiary brands:
Green Supply Chain CITI
Corporate Climate Action CATI
CITI score
24.52
Total Possible Score: 100Total rank
71
Out of 742 total brandsIndustry rank
3
Out of 39 total brands in the Household and Personal Care industry
CATI score
48.60
Total Possible Score: 100Total rank
43
Out of 1504 total brandsIndustry rank
2
Out of 45 total brands in the Household and Personal Care industry
CITI Category Scores Analysis
CATI Category Scores Analysis
CITI Category Scores Benchmarking
CATI Category Scores Benchmarking
CITI Category Scores
CATI Category Scores
1. Responsiveness and Transparency（total score: 14.00）
2.00-
1.1 Respond to Enquiries and Engage with Public
2.00Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China.
-
1.2 Promote Supply Chain Transparency
0.00Brand has not disclosed a list of its suppliers in China.
2. Compliance and Corrective Actions（total score: 18.00）
3.50-
2.1 Establish Screening Mechanism
1.50Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance.
-
2.2 Push Suppliers to Take Corrective Actions
2.00Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing, such as in their Supplier Code of Conduct, and commits to stakeholders that it will push suppliers to adopt corrective actions.
3. Extend Green Supply Chain Practices（total score: 30.00）
5.30-
3.1 Responsible management of chemicals
0.50Brand extends its environmental management to chemical production, use and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.
-
3.2.1* Responsible management of wastewater
2.40Brand extends its environmental management to wastewater generation, treatment and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements. Brand identifies which suppliers use offsite wastewater treatment facilities, and pushes those suppliers to publicly disclose the name of centralized wastewater treatment facilities receiving their wastewater, as well as the discharge standard stipulated in the agreement between the centralized wastewater treatment facility and the supplier, employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental performance of suppliers’ centralized wastewater treatment facilities.
-
3.2.2* Responsible management of solid waste
0.40Brand extends its environmental management to solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements, and employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental performance of suppliers’ solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal entities.
-
3.3 Responsible management of logistic supplier
2.00Brand extends its environmental management to the logistics process along its supply chain and publicly disclose green logistics policies, and employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track logistics suppliers’ environmental performance.
-
3.4 Supplier self-management
0.00Brand has not yet taken action to push its suppliers to control environmental risks along their own supply chains.
4. Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction（total score: 32.00）
11.72-
4.1 Push suppliers to reduce their energy use and carbon footprint, and disclose energy and climate data
9.72Brand calculates the greenhouse gas emissions from its value chain, publicly discloses its value chain reduction targets and implement initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain.
-
4.2 Push suppliers to reduce resource use and pollutant emissions, and disclose pollutant release and transfer data
2.00Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and efficiency, and pollutant reduction target(s) and the progress made against these targets.
5. Promote Public Green Choice（total score: 6.00）
2.00-
5.1 Guide the public into paying attention to the environmental performance of its supply chains in China
2.00Brand guides the public through online interactions and/or offline activities to understand its best practices to motivate suppliers in China to improve their environmental performance.
The total score of category 3.2 is 12, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)
1.1 Governance:
Policy Construction
（total score: 5.00）
5.00
-
1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made climate declaration(s)
2.00 -
1.1.2 Company has developed corporate carbon neutrality plan and management system
2.00 -
1.1.3 Company has incorporated supplier carbon accounting and reporting into written documents such as the supplier code of conduct
1.00
1.2 Governance:
Mechanism Construction
（total score: 5.00）
5.00
-
1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risk management procedures
2.00 -
1.2.2 Company has integrated climate-related issues into board-level oversight
1.00 -
1.2.3 Company offers capacity building and financial incentives, and/or launches innovative projects for suppliers to reduce emissions
2.00
2.1 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1&2 Emissions
（total score: 9.00）
6.00
-
2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 1&2 emission data
3.00 -
2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed comprehensive energy consumption and energy usage by energy types
2.00 -
2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed carbon intensity or energy intensity
0.00 -
2.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed information on carbon emission trading
1.00
2.2 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 Emissions
（total score: 6.00）
5.50
-
2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 3 emissions
4.00 -
2.2.2 Company collects supplier carbon emission data on a regular basis
1.50
2.3 Measurement & Disclosure:
Product Carbon Footprint
（total score: 4.00）
0.00
-
2.3.1 Company has publicly disclosed product carbon footprint
0.00
3.1 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 1&2 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
6.00
-
3.1.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
2.00 -
3.1.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
2.00 -
3.1.3 Company has set and publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
1.00 -
3.1.4 Scope 1 & 2 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
1.00
3.2 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 3 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
4.50
-
3.2.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 3 emission reduction targets
1.50 -
3.2.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
2.00 -
3.2.3 Company has set specific objectives on promoting suppliers to set their own emission reduction targets
0.00 -
3.2.4 Scope 3 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
1.00
4.1 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 1&2 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 7.00）
7.00
-
4.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
3.00 -
4.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
2.00 -
4.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its renewable energy target
2.00
4.2 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 3 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 7.00）
3.00
-
4.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 emission reduction targets
3.00 -
4.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
4.2.3 Company tracks its suppliers’ target setting progress
0.00
5.1 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Company Operation
（total score: 12.00）
3.00
-
5.1.1 Company has conducted non-fossil energy utilization projects and/or green power procurement and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.1.2 Company has conducted energy monitoring and energy management
1.00 -
5.1.3 Company has conducted energy efficiency improvement projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.1.4 Company has conducted other types of emission reduction projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.00 -
5.1.5 Company has reduced emissions through carbon offsets, and disclosed associated emission reductions
1.00
5.2 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Value Chain
（total score: 7.00）
2.00
-
5.2.1 Company promotes suppliers to conduct corporate greenhouse gas and energy management
1.00 -
5.2.2 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with raw material suppliers or supliers related to production manufacturing, and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.00 -
5.2.3 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with logistics suppliers, and disclosed associated emission reductions
1.00 -
5.2.4 Company has published best practices on supply chain carbon management annually
0.00 -
5.2.5 Company has conducted emission reduction projects targeting other emission sources along the value chain and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.00
5.3 Climate Action:
Affiliated Company Engagement
（total score: 8.00）
5.00
-
5.3.1 Affiliates have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emission at facility level
1.00 -
5.3.2 Affiliates have set carbon targets, tracked and public disclosed reduction progress at facility level
4.00
5.4 Climate Action:
Upstream Supplier Engagement
（total score: 16.00）
1.00
-
5.4.1 Direct suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.50 -
5.4.2 Direct suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.3 Indirect suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.50 -
5.4.4 Indirect suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.5 Company employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to empower upstream suppliers to manage their supply chain carbon emissions
0.00
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (15%; Indicator 2.3.1 does not apply), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets (14%) and Climate Action (43%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.
Communication Updates
-
required a packaging factory to conduct an audit for its air emissions supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder L'Oréal, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.Suzhou
Air Emissions
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial emissions pollution;
● Potential impact on: air quality, public health.
Audit
● Rectification progress:Enterprise with supervisions has demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions via third party audits;
●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2022/8/2 18:01:04 -
required a factory to issue an explanation for supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder L'Oréal, actively communicated with environmental groups to issue an explanation for its supervision record(s).Jiaxing
Explanation
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with violations issue a public explanation;
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2021/3/19 13:09:37 -
required a chemical plant to conduct an audit for its wastewater supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder L'Oréal, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.Ma'anshan
Wastewater
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial wastewater pollution;
● Potential impact on: water quality, river ecology, public health. Audit
● Rectification progress:Enterprise with supervisions has demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions via third party audits;
●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2019/9/16 16:42:13 -
required a chemical plant to conduct corrective actions for wastewater supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder L'Oréal, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.Ma'anshan Wastewater
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial wastewater pollution;
● Potential impact on: water quality, river ecology, public health.
Corrective Actions
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has carried out correction action(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2019/8/20 13:58:21
