Subsidiary brands:
Corporate Climate Action CATI
CATI score
58.20
Total Possible Score: 100Total rank
20
Out of 1504 total brandsIndustry rank
1
Out of 57 total brands in the Steel industry
CATI Category Scores Analysis
CATI Category Scores Benchmarking
CATI Category Scores
1.1 Governance:
Policy Construction
（total score: 5.00）
5.00
-
1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made climate declaration(s)
2.00 -
1.1.2 Company has developed corporate carbon neutrality plan and management system
2.00 -
1.1.3 Company has incorporated supplier carbon accounting and reporting into written documents such as the supplier code of conduct
1.00
1.2 Governance:
Mechanism Construction
（total score: 5.00）
5.00
-
1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risk management procedures
2.00 -
1.2.2 Company has integrated climate-related issues into board-level oversight
1.00 -
1.2.3 Company offers capacity building and financial incentives, and/or launches innovative projects for suppliers to reduce emissions
2.00
2.1 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1&2 Emissions
（total score: 9.00）
7.00
-
2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 1&2 emission data
3.00 -
2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed comprehensive energy consumption and energy usage by energy types
1.00 -
2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed carbon intensity or energy intensity
2.00 -
2.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed information on carbon emission trading
1.00
2.2 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 Emissions
（total score: 6.00）
4.00
-
2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 3 emissions
4.00 -
2.2.2 Company collects supplier carbon emission data on a regular basis
0.00
2.3 Measurement & Disclosure:
Product Carbon Footprint
（total score: 4.00）
4.00
-
2.3.1 Company has publicly disclosed product carbon footprint
4.00
3.1 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 1&2 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
6.00
-
3.1.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
3.00 -
3.1.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
2.00 -
3.1.3 Company has set and publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
1.00 -
3.1.4 Scope 1 & 2 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
0.00
3.2 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 3 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
3.50
-
3.2.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 3 emission reduction targets
1.50 -
3.2.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
2.00 -
3.2.3 Company has set specific objectives on promoting suppliers to set their own emission reduction targets
0.00 -
3.2.4 Scope 3 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
0.00
4.1 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 1&2 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 7.00）
5.00
-
4.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
3.00 -
4.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
4.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its renewable energy target
2.00
4.2 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 3 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 7.00）
0.00
-
4.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 emission reduction targets
0.00 -
4.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
4.2.3 Company tracks its suppliers’ target setting progress
0.00
5.1 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Company Operation
（total score: 12.00）
6.00
-
5.1.1 Company has conducted non-fossil energy utilization projects and/or green power procurement and disclosed associated emission reductions
1.00 -
5.1.2 Company has conducted energy monitoring and energy management
1.00 -
5.1.3 Company has conducted energy efficiency improvement projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
2.50 -
5.1.4 Company has conducted other types of emission reduction projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.1.5 Company has reduced emissions through carbon offsets, and disclosed associated emission reductions
1.00
5.2 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Value Chain
（total score: 7.00）
3.00
-
5.2.1 Company promotes suppliers to conduct corporate greenhouse gas and energy management
1.00 -
5.2.2 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with raw material suppliers or supliers related to production manufacturing, and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.2.3 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with logistics suppliers, and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.2.4 Company has published best practices on supply chain carbon management annually
0.00 -
5.2.5 Company has conducted emission reduction projects targeting other emission sources along the value chain and disclosed associated emission reductions
1.00
5.3 Climate Action:
Affiliated Company Engagement
（total score: 8.00）
1.00
-
5.3.1 Affiliates have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emission at facility level
1.00 -
5.3.2 Affiliates have set carbon targets, tracked and public disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00
5.4 Climate Action:
Upstream Supplier Engagement
（total score: 16.00）
0.00
-
5.4.1 Direct suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.2 Direct suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.3 Indirect suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.4 Indirect suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.5 Company employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to empower upstream suppliers to manage their supply chain carbon emissions
0.00
Note:
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (15%; Indicator 2.3.1 does not apply), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets (14%) and Climate Action (43%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.
Communication Updates
-
required a factory to conduct an audit for its supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder BAOSTEEL, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.Wuhan
Audit
● Rectification progress:Enterprise with supervisions has demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions via third party audits;
●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/8/3 9:30:38 -
required a factory to conduct an audit for its supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder BAOSTEEL, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.Shanghai Audit
● Rectification progress:Enterprise with supervisions has demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions via third party audits;
●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/5/23 11:34:11 -
required a steel mill to conduct corrective actions for air emissions, noise supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder BAOSTEEL, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.Wuhan
Air Emissions
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial emissions pollution;
● Potential impact on: air quality, public health.
Noise
● Environmental violation issue: Noise pollution;
● Potential impact on: Environmental quality; public health.
Corrective Actions
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has carried out correction action(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/4/19 14:47:48 -
required a steel mill to issue an explanation for air emissions, noise supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder BAOSTEEL, actively communicated with environmental groups to issue an explanation for its supervision record(s) .Wuhan Air Emissions
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial emissions pollution;
● Potential impact on: air quality, public health. Noise
● Environmental violation issue: Noise pollution;
● Potential impact on: Environmental quality; public health.
Explanation
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has issued public explanation(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/1/17 18:19:51
