IPE Notices Disclaimer Blue Map APP
中文
Home Maps Climate Records Supply Chain Green Finance Reports About IPE IPE企业数据库

Green Supply Chain CITI

Corporate Climate Action CATI

  • CITI score

    37.15

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    38

    Out of 591 total brands
  • Industry rank

    2

    Out of 7 total brands in the Diversified industry
  • Industry rank

    4

    Out of 31 total brands in the Household Appliances industry
  • CATI score

    23.23

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    119

    Out of 655 total brands
  • Industry rank

    4

    Out of 7 total brands in the Diversified industry
  • Industry rank

    8

    Out of 31 total brands in the Household Appliances industry

CITI Category Scores Analysis

CATI Category Scores Analysis

CITI Category Scores Benchmarking

CATI Category Scores Benchmarking

CITI Category Scores

CATI Category Scores

1.  Responsiveness and Transparency（total score: 14.00）

8.00
  • 1.1 Respond to Enquiries and Engage with Public
    4.00

    Brand appoints someone to follow up on supplier(s) with environmental violation(s), communicates with stakeholders on at least a quarterly basis, and pushes supplier(s) to issue public explanation(s).

  • 1.2 Promote Supply Chain Transparency
    4.00

    Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually and the list includes higher environmental impact suppliers; OR brand pushes its suppliers in China, including suppliers with high environmental impacts, to use alternate means to accept public supervision of their environmental performance, such as by pushing suppliers to use the Blue Map website and/or mobile app to track their own environmental compliance performance

2.  Compliance and Corrective Actions（total score: 22.00）

12.50
  • 2.1 Establish Screening Mechanism
    7.50

    Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance AND pushes suppliers to track their own environmental compliance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.

  • 2.2 Push Suppliers to Take Corrective Actions
    5.00

    Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to stakeholders that it will push suppliers to adopt corrective actions, and pushes problem suppliers to promptly issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, and current compliance status in a timely manner, and pushes suppliers with high environmental risks to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions.

3.  Extend Green Supply Chain Practices（total score: 32.00）

10.00
  • 3.1 Responsible management of chemical suppliers
    2.00

    Brand extends its environmental management to chemical suppliers, and publicly requires environmental compliance from these suppliers.

  • 3.2.1* Responsible management of wastewater
    1.50

    Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental compliance performance of suppliers’ centralized wastewater treatment facilities.

  • 3.2.2* Responsible management of solid waste (including hazardous waste)
    3.50

    Brand extends its environmental management to solid waste transportation and disposal entities, and publicly requires them for environmental compliance. Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental compliance performance of suppliers’ solid waste transportation and disposal entities, and pushes suppliers to notify those with environmental violations to adopt corrective measures.

  • 3.3 Responsible management of logistic supplier
    2.00

    Brand extends its environmental management to logistics suppliers, and publicly requires environmental compliance from these suppliers. Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track logistics suppliers’ environmental compliance performance. Problem suppliers are pushed to take corrective actions and at lease disclose information about their environmental violation issues.

  • 3.4 Supplier self-management
    1.00

    Brand pushes direct suppliers to screen their own suppliers’ environmental compliance through supplier trainings or other programs.

4.  Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction（total score: 24.00）

6.65
  • 4.1 Push suppliers to reduce their energy use and carbon footprint, and disclose energy and climate data
    4.65

    Brand begins to calculate its greenhouse gas emissions, or publicly discloses its ongoing emissions reduction targets, or begins to manage emissions from its supply chain.

  • 4.2 Push suppliers to reduce resource use and pollutant emissions, and disclose pollutant release and transfer data
    2.00

    Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and pollutant emissions reduction target(s).

5.  Promote Public Green Choice（total score: 8.00）

0.00
  • 5.1 Direct the public attention to the environmental performance of Chinses suppliers
    0.00

    Brand has not yet conducted this type of work.

Note:

The total score of category 3.2 is 10, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)

1.1  Governance:
Pledged policies （total score: 6.00）

4.00
  • 1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made a climate declaration
    1.00
  • 1.1.2 Developed carbon neutrality policies
    2.00
  • 1.1.3 Published specific policies to promote supply chain emissions reductions
    1.00
  • 1.1.4 Developed policies to guide low-carbon consumption
    0.00

1.2  Governance:
Mechanism construction （total score: 7.00）

5.00
  • 1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risks management procedures
    1.00
  • 1.2.2 Climate-related issues receive board-level oversight
    2.00
  • 1.2.3 Climate-related issues are included in supplier qualification/management mechanism
    2.00
  • 1.2.4 Company offers financial incentives for suppliers to reduce emissions
    0.00

2.1  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1+2 emissions （total score: 12.00）

9.00
  • 2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed its total scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions
    2.00
  • 2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed its scope 1 emissions
    1.00
  • 2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed its scope 2 emissions
    1.00
  • 2.1.4 Provides third party verification/assurance (or has attempted to verify the accuracy of its emissions through digital mode)
    0.00
  • 2.1.5 Reports its carbon intensity
    2.00
  • 2.1.6 Reports its energy consumption
    1.00
  • 2.1.7 Reports its energy efficiency
    0.00
  • 2.1.8 Reports its energy use
    1.00
  • 2.1.9 Discloses its information on carbon allowances/offsets
    1.00

2.2  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 emissions （total score: 8.00）

2.00
  • 2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed its total Scope 3 emissions
    1.00
  • 2.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed supply chain emissions
    1.00
  • 2.2.3 Company has identified the largest sources of emissions across the supply chain and has started to collect emissions data from carbon hotspot suppliers
    0.00
  • 2.2.4 Company collects GHG emissions information from more than 40% of suppliers
    0.00
  • 2.2.5 Company collects GHG emissions information from more than 80% of suppliers
    0.00
  • 2.2.6 Company collects GHG emissions information at least annually from suppliers
    0.00
  • 2.2.7 Company collects GHG emissions information at least quarterly from suppliers
    0.00

3.1  Targets & Performance:
Scope 1+2 targets （total score: 11.00）

9.00
  • 3.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed its ongoing emissions reduction targets
    5.00
  • 3.1.2 Targets are approved by the Science-Based Targets initiative
    0.00
  • 3.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed its carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 3.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
    2.00

3.2  Targets & Performance:
Scope 3 targets （total score: 12.00）

0.00
  • 3.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed its ongoing emissions reduction targets
    0.00
  • 3.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed its carbon neutrality target
    0.00
  • 3.2.3 Company has publicly disclosed its supply chain emissions reduction targets
    0.00
  • 3.2.4 Sets specific objectives on promoting suppliers in China to set emissions reduction targets
    0.00

3.3  Targets & Performance:
Performance against Scope 1+2 targets （total score: 3.00）

3.00
  • 3.3.1 Company has reported on progress made against its emissions reduction targets
    1.00
  • 3.3.2 Company has reported on progress made against its carbon neutrality target
    1.00
  • 3.3.3 Company has reported on progress made against its renewable energy target
    1.00

3.4  Targets & Performance:
Performance against Scope 3 targets （total score: 6.00）

0.00
  • 3.4.1 Company has reported on progress made against its emissions reduction targets
    0.00
  • 3.4.2 Company has reported on progress made against its carbon neutrality target
    0.00
  • 3.4.3 Company has reported on progress made against its supply chain emissions reduction targets
    0.00
  • 3.4.4 Followed up on supplier targets setting progress through public reporting in IPE's PRTR program
    0.00

4.1  Climate Action:
Owned operation management （total score: 10.00）

1.00
  • 4.1.1 Company has implemented low-carbon energy initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions for its Scope 1 and 2 emissions
    1.00
  • 4.1.2 Implemented low-carbon energy initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 10% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00
  • 4.1.3 Implemented low-carbon energy initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 40% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00
  • 4.1.4 Implemented energy efficiency initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions for its Scope 1 and 2 emissions
    0.00
  • 4.1.5 Implemented energy efficiency initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 10% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00
  • 4.1.6 Implemented energy efficiency initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 40% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00
  • 4.1.7 Implemented other emissions reduction initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions for its Scope 1 and 2
    0.00
  • 4.1.8 Implemented other emissions reduction initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 10% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00
  • 4.1.9 Implemented other emissions reduction initiatives and disclosed associated emissions reductions (covered more than 40% of Scope 1+2 emissions)
    0.00

4.2  Climate Action:
Supply chain management （total score: 10.00）

3.00
  • 4.2.1 Company has integrated climate change is into supplier evaluation processes
    2.00
  • 4.2.2 Climate change is included in supplier training and capacity building
    1.00
  • 4.2.3 Climate change is promoted as an area for innovation for suppliers
    0.00
  • 4.2.4 Company has launched emissions reduction initiatives in cooperation with pilot suppliers and disclosed associated emissions reductions
    0.00
  • 4.2.5 Company has launched emissions reduction initiatives in cooperation with pilot suppliers and disclosed associated emissions reductions (more than 10% participation)
    0.00
  • 4.2.6 Company has launched large-scale emissions reduction initiatives and disclosed associated emission reductions (more than 40% participation)
    0.00
  • 4.2.7 Company has published best practices in supply chain GHG reduction initiatives annually
    0.00

4.3  Climate Action:
Supply chain emissions disclosure （total score: 25.00）

0.00
  • 4.3.1 Company requires suppliers to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually
    0.00
  • 4.3.2 Company requires suppliers to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually (more than 10%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.3 Company requires suppliers to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually (more than 40%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.4 Company requires suppliers to set and disclose their own emissions reduction targets and performance against targets
    0.00
  • 4.3.5 Company requires suppliers to set and disclose their own emissions reduction targets and performance against targets (more than 10%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.6 Company requires suppliers to set and disclose their own emissions reduction targets and performance against targets (more than 40%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.7 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually
    0.00
  • 4.3.8 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually (more than 10%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.9 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to calculate and disclose their GHG emissions annually (more than 40%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.10 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to set and disclose their emissions reduction targets and performance against targets
    0.00
  • 4.3.11 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to set and disclose their emissions reduction targets and performance against targets (more than 10%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.12 Company requires indirect carbon hotspot suppliers upstream in supply chain to set and disclose their emissions reduction targets and performance against targets (more than 40%)
    0.00
  • 4.3.13 Company employs the Blue EcoChain tool to empower upstream suppliers on supply chain emissions management
    0.00
Note:

As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across three of the four CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure, Targets & Performance, and Climate Action. The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.

Communication Updates

  • required environmental company to conduct an audit for its supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Royal Philips, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) from the year(s) 2017, and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.
    Dongguan
     Audit
    ● Rectification progress:Enterprise with violations complete the relevant GCA third-party audits to verify the completion and effectiveness of its corrective actions;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2022/7/13 9:13:21
  • required electronics factory to issue an explanation for air emissions, solid waste supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Royal Philips, actively communicated with environmental groups to issue an explanation for its supervision record(s) from the year(s) 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.
    Suzhou
     Air Emissions
    ● Environmental violation issue: Industrial emissions pollution;
    ● Potential impact on: air quality, public health.
     Solid Waste
    ● Environmental violation issue: Industrial solid waste pollution;
    ● Potential impact on: soil and ground water quality, public health.
     Explanation
    ● Rectification progress: Enterprise with violations issue a public explanation;
    ● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2022/6/23 16:43:30
  • required battery factory to conduct corrective actions for wastewater supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Royal Philips, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) from the year(s) 2015, and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.
    Foshan
     Wastewater
    ● Environmental violation issue: Industrial wastewater pollution;
    ● Potential impact on: water quality, river ecology, public health.
     Corrective Actions
    ● Rectification progress: Enterprise with violations carry-out correction actions;
    ● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2022/5/27 14:06:33
  • required electronics factory to conduct an audit for its supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Royal Philips, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) from the year(s) 2017, 2018, and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.
    Dongguan
     Audit
    ● Rectification progress:Enterprise with violations complete the relevant GCA third-party audits to verify the completion and effectiveness of its corrective actions;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2021/9/15 11:17:00
Previous Page 1/26Next Page

Other Industry Brands

Previous Page 1/3Next Page
x