RIGHT ON TRACK TO FOREVER. BETTER.
“Our FOREVER. BETTER. sustainability strategy aims to make PUMA better across the entire value chain, whether it comes to materials, carbon emissions, circularity...”
77.76
Total Possible Score: 1005
Out of 742 total brands3
Out of 60 total brands in the Leather & PU industry4
Out of 126 total brands in the Textile industry79.80
Total Possible Score: 1002
Out of 1504 total brands2
Out of 60 total brands in the Leather & PU industry2
Out of 157 total brands in the Textile industryBrand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and the frequency of communication with stakeholders occurs more often than quarterly, OR Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and employs the automatic reporting form provided by the Blue EcoChain or equivalent systems to communicate with stakeholders about green supply chain management.
Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually and the list includes higher environmental impact suppliers, publicly discloses supply chain environmental information in the form of a map, and pushes suppliers disclosed on the map to track their own environmental compliance performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.
Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance AND comprehensively pushes its suppliers to track their own environmental compliance, including potential suppliers.
Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to stakeholders that it will push suppliers to adopt corrective actions, and pushes problem suppliers to promptly issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, and current compliance status in a timely manner, and pushes suppliers with high environmental risks to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Additionally, Brand has reached a written agreement with its suppliers to join the Blue EcoChain or equivalent system to follow a set process for promptly adopting follow-up corrective actions and conducting information disclosure (even without brand involvement), and promoted its implementation.
Brand pushes problem suppliers to promptly issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, current compliance status in a timely manner, verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions or continuously disclose information on corrective actions, and pushes chemical suppliers to track their own environmental performance via the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.
pushes suppliers to notify centralized wastewater treatment facilities with environmental violations to adopt corrective measures, issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress and current compliance status. Brands comprehensively pushes centralized wastewater treatment facilities to track their own environmental performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods, and automatically implement follow-up corrective actions and conducts information disclosure. OR Brand continues to improve the wastewater management and control capabilities of suppliers, publicly shares best practices on scaling up the efforts to reduce the environmental impact of wastewater discharge along its supply chain.
Brand comprehensively pushes solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal entities to track their own environmental performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods, and automatically implement follow-up corrective actions and conduct information disclosure. OR Brand reduces the environmental impacts of solid waste production, transportation, utilization and disposal across the supply chain or that of product recycling, reuse and resource utilization, promotes a fully closed-loop flow of “resources-products-consumption-renewable resource” cycle, and publicly share best practices on scaling up the efforts to reduce the environmental impact of solid waste reduction and resource utilization.
Brand pushes problem suppliers to issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, current compliance status in a timely manner, and pushes logistics suppliers to track their own and their subsidiaries’ environmental performance via the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.
Brand empowers its suppliers to manage environmental risks along their own supply chains.
Brand comprehensively calculates the emission from value chain, publicly disclose value chain reduction target and track the progress made against its emissions reduction targets. Brand works with its suppliers to reduce emissions and motivate suppliers to calculate their own emissions and set up their own emissions reduction targets and track the progress.
Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and efficiency, and pollutant reduction target(s) and the progress made against these targets. Brands has identified priority sectors for resource use and pollutant emissions in its supply chain in China, as well as suppliers with high resource consumption and pollutant emissions, and continuously pushes identified suppliers with high resource consumption and pollutant emissions in China to measure and publicly disclose their verified PRTR data, set up and publicly disclose their reduction targets.
Brand establishes waste recycling systems, publicly discloses recycling methods and progress, and guides the public to participate in waste recycling. Or Brand establishes plastic reduction mechanisms in the production, distribution, recycling, and disposal of products, and guides the public to participate in plastic reduction actions.
The total score of category 3.2 is 12, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (15%; Indicator 2.3.1 does not apply), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets (14%) and Climate Action (43%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.
Beginning in 2013, Puma actively promoted its production-oriented suppliers to participate in the three-year SAVE (Sustainable Action and Vision for a Better Environment) project. The project aimed to promote Asian clothing, shoes and jewelry manufacturers’ capacity-building to enhance their environmental friendliness.