36.53
Total Possible Score: 10040
Out of 591 total brands23
Out of 96 total brands in the Textile industry3.64
Total Possible Score: 100304
Out of 655 total brands58
Out of 97 total brands in the Textile industryBrand appoints someone to follow up on supplier(s) with environmental violation(s) (the frequency of communication with stakeholders occurs more often than quarterly) and pushes supplier(s) to issue public explanation(s). OR brand employs the automatic reporting form provided by the Blue EcoChain or equivalent system to communicate with stakeholders about suppliers’ environmental violations and the effectiveness of corrective actions.
Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually and the list includes higher environmental impact suppliers, publicly discloses supply chain environmental information in the form of a map, and pushes suppliers disclosed on the map to track their own environmental compliance performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods, OR Brand comprehensively pushes its suppliers in China, including suppliers with high environmental impacts, to use the Blue EcoChain or other automated system to track their own environmental performance and commit to provide public disclosures regarding violations in a timely manner, thereby accepting public supervision.
Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance AND pushes suppliers to track their own environmental compliance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.
Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to stakeholders that it will push suppliers to adopt corrective actions, and pushes suppliers to adopt corrective actions and issue public explanations about their environmental violation issues.
Brand extends its environmental management to chemical suppliers, and publicly requires environmental compliance from these suppliers. Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track chemical suppliers’ environmental compliance performance. Problem suppliers are pushed to take corrective actions and at least publicly disclose information about their environmental violation issues.
Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental compliance performance of suppliers’ centralized wastewater treatment facilities.
Brand extends its environmental management to solid waste transportation and disposal entities, and publicly requires them for environmental compliance. Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track the environmental compliance performance of suppliers’ solid waste transportation and disposal entities, and pushes suppliers to notify those with environmental violations to adopt corrective measures.
Brand extends its environmental management to logistics suppliers, and publicly requires environmental compliance from these suppliers. Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track logistics suppliers’ environmental compliance performance. Problem suppliers are pushed to take corrective actions and at lease disclose information about their environmental violation issues.
Brand pushes direct suppliers to screen their own suppliers’ environmental compliance through supplier trainings or other programs. Brand pushes its direct suppliers to employ the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track their own suppliers’ environmental compliance. Problem suppliers are pushed to take corrective actions and disclose information about their environmental violation issues
Company has committed to climate actions and made a climate declaration or begins to calculate and disclose its greenhouse gas emissions.
Brand has not yet set up or publicly disclosed resource consumption and pollutant emissions reduction target(s).
Brand discloses information in annual reports and other public documents, websites, social media platforms or other public channels about its work to promote its suppliers in China to improve their environmental performance
The total score of category 3.2 is 10, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across three of the four CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure, Targets & Performance, and Climate Action. The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.