Green Supply Chain CITI

Corporate Climate Action CATI

  • CITI score

    75.10

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    8

    Out of 742 total brands
  • Industry rank

    2

    Out of 69 total brands in the IT/ ICT industry
  • CATI score

    77.50

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    6

    Out of 1504 total brands
  • Industry rank

    3

    Out of 107 total brands in the IT/ ICT industry

CITI Category Scores Analysis

CATI Category Scores Analysis

CITI Category Scores Benchmarking

CATI Category Scores Benchmarking

CITI Category Scores

CATI Category Scores

1.  Responsiveness and Transparency(total score: 14.00)

12.00
  • 1.1 Respond to Enquiries and Engage with Public
    6.00

    Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and the frequency of communication with stakeholders occurs more often than quarterly, OR Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and employs the automatic reporting form provided by the Blue EcoChain or equivalent systems to communicate with stakeholders about green supply chain management.

  • 1.2 Promote Supply Chain Transparency
    6.00

    Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually and the list includes higher environmental impact suppliers, and publicly discloses supply chain environmental information in the form of a map, OR Brand comprehensively pushes its suppliers in China, including suppliers with high environmental impacts, to use the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track their own environmental performance and commit to provide public disclosures regarding violations in a timely manner, thereby accepting public supervision.

2.  Compliance and Corrective Actions(total score: 18.00)

17.00
  • 2.1 Establish Screening Mechanism
    6.00

    Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance AND comprehensively pushes its suppliers to track their own environmental compliance, including potential suppliers.

  • 2.2 Push Suppliers to Take Corrective Actions
    11.00

    Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to stakeholders that it will push suppliers to adopt corrective actions, and pushes problem suppliers to promptly issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, and current compliance status in a timely manner, and pushes suppliers with high environmental risks to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Additionally, Brand has reached a written agreement with its suppliers to join the Blue EcoChain or equivalent system to follow a set process for promptly adopting follow-up corrective actions and conducting information disclosure (even without brand involvement), and promoted its implementation.

3.  Extend Green Supply Chain Practices(total score: 30.00)

16.60
  • 3.1 Responsible management of chemicals
    2.00

    Brand extends its environmental management to chemical production, use and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements, and employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track chemical suppliers’ environmental performance.

  • 3.2.1* Responsible management of wastewater
    1.80

    pushes suppliers to notify centralized wastewater treatment facilities with environmental violations to adopt corrective measures, issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress and current compliance status. Brands comprehensively pushes centralized wastewater treatment facilities to track their own environmental performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods, and automatically implement follow-up corrective actions and conducts information disclosure. OR Brand continues to improve the wastewater management and control capabilities of suppliers, publicly shares best practices on scaling up the efforts to reduce the environmental impact of wastewater discharge along its supply chain.

  • 3.2.2* Responsible management of solid waste
    6.30

    Brand comprehensively pushes solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal entities to track their own environmental performance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods, and automatically implement follow-up corrective actions and conduct information disclosure. OR Brand reduces the environmental impacts of solid waste production, transportation, utilization and disposal across the supply chain or that of product recycling, reuse and resource utilization, promotes a fully closed-loop flow of “resources-products-consumption-renewable resource” cycle, and publicly share best practices on scaling up the efforts to reduce the environmental impact of solid waste reduction and resource utilization.

  • 3.3 Responsible management of logistic supplier
    1.50

    Brand extends its environmental management to the logistics process along its supply chain and publicly disclose green logistics policies, and employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track logistics suppliers’ environmental performance.

  • 3.4 Supplier self-management
    5.00

    Supplier pushes its own problem suppliers to promptly issue public explanations regarding the reason for violation, corrective actions already undertaken or in progress, current compliance status in a timely manner, verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions or continuously disclose information on corrective actions, and pushes its suppliers to track their environmental performance via the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.

4.  Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction(total score: 32.00)

25.50
  • 4.1 Push suppliers to reduce their energy use and carbon footprint, and disclose energy and climate data
    15.50

    Brand comprehensively calculates the emission from value chain, publicly disclose value chain reduction target and track the progress made against its emissions reduction targets. Brand works with its suppliers to reduce emissions and motivate suppliers to calculate their own emissions and set up their own emissions reduction targets and track the progress.

  • 4.2 Push suppliers to reduce resource use and pollutant emissions, and disclose pollutant release and transfer data
    10.00

    Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and efficiency, and pollutant reduction target(s) and the progress made against these targets. Brands has identified priority sectors for resource use and pollutant emissions in its supply chain in China, as well as suppliers with high resource consumption and pollutant emissions, and continuously pushes identified suppliers with high resource consumption and pollutant emissions in China to measure and publicly disclose their verified PRTR data, set up and publicly disclose their reduction targets.

5.  Promote Public Green Choice(total score: 6.00)

4.00
  • 5.1 Guide the public into paying attention to the environmental performance of its supply chains in China
    4.00

    Through product packaging, labeling, online and/or offline sales channels, the brand guides the public to understand environmentally friendly product design that is easy to sort, recycle and reuse, as well as the approaches and results of manufacturing, supply chain management, logistics, product use, waste product and packaging recycling, and other processes to reduce environmental impact or environmental footprint.

Note:

The total score of category 3.2 is 12, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)

1.1  Governance:
Policy Construction (total score: 5.00)

5.00
  • 1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made climate declaration(s)
    2.00
  • 1.1.2 Company has developed corporate carbon neutrality plan and management system
    2.00
  • 1.1.3 Company has incorporated supplier carbon accounting and reporting into written documents such as the supplier code of conduct
    1.00

1.2  Governance:
Mechanism Construction (total score: 5.00)

5.00
  • 1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risk management procedures
    2.00
  • 1.2.2 Company has integrated climate-related issues into board-level oversight
    1.00
  • 1.2.3 Company offers capacity building and financial incentives, and/or launches innovative projects for suppliers to reduce emissions
    2.00

2.1  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1&2 Emissions (total score: 9.00)

8.00
  • 2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 1&2 emission data
    3.00
  • 2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed comprehensive energy consumption and energy usage by energy types
    2.00
  • 2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed carbon intensity or energy intensity
    2.00
  • 2.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed information on carbon emission trading
    1.00

2.2  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 Emissions (total score: 6.00)

6.00
  • 2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 3 emissions
    4.00
  • 2.2.2 Company collects supplier carbon emission data on a regular basis
    2.00

2.3  Measurement & Disclosure:
Product Carbon Footprint (total score: 4.00)

0.00
  • 2.3.1 Company has publicly disclosed product carbon footprint
    0.00

3.1  Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 1&2 Targets (total score: 7.00)

7.00
  • 3.1.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 3.1.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 3.1.3 Company has set and publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
    1.00
  • 3.1.4 Scope 1 & 2 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
    1.00

3.2  Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 3 Targets (total score: 7.00)

7.00
  • 3.2.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 3 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 3.2.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 3.2.3 Company has set specific objectives on promoting suppliers to set their own emission reduction targets
    1.00
  • 3.2.4 Scope 3 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
    1.00

4.1  Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 1&2 Emission Reduction Progress (total score: 7.00)

7.00
  • 4.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 4.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 4.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its renewable energy target
    2.00

4.2  Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 3 Emission Reduction Progress (total score: 7.00)

7.00
  • 4.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 4.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 4.2.3 Company tracks its suppliers’ target setting progress
    2.00

5.1  Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Company Operation (total score: 12.00)

8.50
  • 5.1.1 Company has conducted non-fossil energy utilization projects and/or green power procurement and disclosed associated emission reductions
    2.00
  • 5.1.2 Company has conducted energy monitoring and energy management
    1.00
  • 5.1.3 Company has conducted energy efficiency improvement projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
    4.00
  • 5.1.4 Company has conducted other types of emission reduction projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.50
  • 5.1.5 Company has reduced emissions through carbon offsets, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    1.00

5.2  Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Value Chain (total score: 7.00)

5.50
  • 5.2.1 Company promotes suppliers to conduct corporate greenhouse gas and energy management
    1.00
  • 5.2.2 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with raw material suppliers or supliers related to production manufacturing, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    1.50
  • 5.2.3 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with logistics suppliers, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.50
  • 5.2.4 Company has published best practices on supply chain carbon management annually
    2.00
  • 5.2.5 Company has conducted emission reduction projects targeting other emission sources along the value chain and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.50

5.3  Climate Action:
Affiliated Company Engagement (total score: 8.00)

4.00
  • 5.3.1 Affiliates have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emission at facility level
    2.00
  • 5.3.2 Affiliates have set carbon targets, tracked and public disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    2.00

5.4  Climate Action:
Upstream Supplier Engagement (total score: 16.00)

7.50
  • 5.4.1 Direct suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
    2.00
  • 5.4.2 Direct suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    1.50
  • 5.4.3 Indirect suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
    0.50
  • 5.4.4 Indirect suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    0.50
  • 5.4.5 Company employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to empower upstream suppliers to manage their supply chain carbon emissions
    3.00
Note:

As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (15%; Indicator 2.3.1 does not apply), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets (14%) and Climate Action (43%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.

Brand Storiesmore

  • Resource recycling, practicing waste reduction and carbon reduction

    Foxconn Technology Group (hereinafter referred to as Foxconn), as the world's largest electronic technology manufacturing service provider, continuously improves the level of environmental protection and waste reduction throughout the entire industry chain, and strengthens cooperation with customers in environmental management. In recent years, the reduction, resource utilization, and harmless disposal of factory waste has become a very important topic in the electronic industry supply chain.

  • Foxconn Supplier Carbon Reduction Case

    The emission reduction case of a Foxconn supplier illustrates how to work with partners to reduce carbon emissions in the supply chain.

  • Foxconn Supply Chain Carbon Neutral Initiative

    Energy conservation and emission reduction has become an important concern topic for global enterprise. As a leader in technology manufacturing industry, Chairman Liu Yangwei of Foxconn Technology Group defined the strategic direction of "sustainable operation = EPS + ESG", focusing on "Integrity Management, Innovation and Service, Responsible Supply Chain, Green Manufacturing, Friendly Workplace", taking energy conservation, emission reduction, greening and recycling as Foxconn energy policy.

  • Foxconn Supply Chain Carbon Neutral Initiative

    Hon Hai Foxconn attaches great importance to the carbon neutral policy and announced Hon Hai Climate Action 100+ net zero emission target and commitment on its official website.

  • Foxconn's Energy-Saving and Carbon-Reduction Practices

    Foxconn joins hands with partners to build a green ecosystem, promote product energy conservation, low carbon emissions, greening and recycling through the green supply chain life cycle, and guide the industry toward greening and reduce the impact on the environment.

  • Foxconn Green Supply Chain Practice Model

    Foxconn promotes a supplier factory to implement environmental strategies to achieve wastewater, exhaust gas, hazardous waste reduction and energy conservation.

  • Foxconn's Energy-Saving and Carbon-Reduction Practices

    Foxconn, the world’s largest electronics manufacturer, set up a special energy-reduction technology arm in order to implement energy savings targets and reduce energy consumption, establishing a management platform of “save energy, reduce emissions, go green, recycle.”

Communication Updates

  • required a factory to issue an explanation for supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Foxconn, actively communicated with environmental groups to issue an explanation for its supervision record(s) from the year(s) 2019.
    Suzhou
     Explanation
    ● Rectification progress:  Enterprise with supervisions has issued public explanation(s);
    ● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date:2024/2/27 7:51:23
  • required a factory to report its annual GHG emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Foxconn, actively reported its GHG emissions data in 2023.
    Suzhou
     Uploaded Carbon Data
    ● Enterprise has uploaded annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date:2024/2/27 0:35:40
  • required a factory to disclose its annual resource use and emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Foxconn, actively reported its pollutant release and transfer registry (PRTR) data. The factory has reported and publicly disclosed PRTR data in 2022, 2023.
    Zhuhai
     Disclosed PRTR Data
    ● Enterprise has published annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date:2024/2/26 13:30:27
  • required a factory to report its annual GHG emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Foxconn, actively reported its GHG emissions data in 2023.
    Zhuhai
     Uploaded Carbon Data
    ● Enterprise has uploaded annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date:2024/2/24 11:03:55
x