IPE Notices Disclaimer Blue Map APP
中文
Home Maps Climate Records Supply Chain Green Finance Reports About IPE

Green Supply Chain CITI

Corporate Climate Action CATI

  • CITI score

    29.06

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    61

    Out of 741 total brands
  • Industry rank

    29

    Out of 126 total brands in the Textile industry
  • CATI score

    42.80

    Total Possible Score: 100
  • Total rank

    92

    Out of 1510 total brands
  • Industry rank

    27

    Out of 157 total brands in the Textile industry

CITI Category Scores Analysis

CATI Category Scores Analysis

CITI Category Scores Benchmarking

CATI Category Scores Benchmarking

CITI Category Scores

CATI Category Scores

1.  Responsiveness and Transparency（total score: 14.00）

8.00
  • 1.1 Respond to Enquiries and Engage with Public
    6.00

    Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and the frequency of communication with stakeholders occurs more often than quarterly, OR Brand appoints someone to follow up on green supply chain management in China, and employs the automatic reporting form provided by the Blue EcoChain or equivalent systems to communicate with stakeholders about green supply chain management.

  • 1.2 Promote Supply Chain Transparency
    2.00

    Brand updates published list of its suppliers in China at least annually; OR Brand has attempted to push its suppliers in China to use the Blue EcoChain or other automated system to track their own environmental performance and commit to provide public disclosures regarding violations in a timely manner, thereby accepting public supervision.

2.  Compliance and Corrective Actions（total score: 18.00）

6.50
  • 2.1 Establish Screening Mechanism
    2.50

    Brand employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ environmental compliance AND pushes suppliers to track their own environmental compliance via Blue EcoChain or other automated methods.

  • 2.2 Push Suppliers to Take Corrective Actions
    4.00

    Brand publicly requires supplier environmental compliance in writing and commits to pushing problem suppliers to adopt corrective actions and at least publicly disclose explanations about their environmental violation issues.

3.  Extend Green Supply Chain Practices（total score: 30.00）

3.00
  • 3.1 Responsible management of chemicals
    0.50

    Brand extends its environmental management to chemical production, use and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.

  • 3.2.1* Responsible management of wastewater
    0.70

    Brand extends its environmental management to wastewater generation, treatment and discharge along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.

  • 3.2.2* Responsible management of solid waste
    0.30

    Brand extends its environmental management to solid waste transportation, utilization and disposal along its supply chain, and publicly discloses matching requirements.

  • 3.3 Responsible management of logistic supplier
    0.50

    Brand extends its environmental management to the logistics process along its supply chain and publicly disclose green logistics policies.

  • 3.4 Supplier self-management
    1.00

    Brand empowers its suppliers to manage environmental risks along their own supply chains.

4.  Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction（total score: 32.00）

10.56
  • 4.1 Push suppliers to reduce their energy use and carbon footprint, and disclose energy and climate data
    8.56

    Brand calculates the greenhouse gas emissions from its value chain, publicly discloses its value chain reduction targets and implement initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain.

  • 4.2 Push suppliers to reduce resource use and pollutant emissions, and disclose pollutant release and transfer data
    2.00

    Brand has publicly disclosed resource use and efficiency, and pollutant reduction target(s) and the progress made against these targets.

5.  Promote Public Green Choice（total score: 6.00）

1.00
  • 5.1 Guide the public into paying attention to the environmental performance of its supply chains in China
    1.00

    Brand proactively discloses information in annual reports and other public documents, websites, social media platforms or other public channels about its work to improve supply chain environmental performance.

Note:

The total score of category 3.2 is 12, while the conversion ratio for indicator 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 will vary by industry (See CITI Evaluation Guidelines-Appendix II)

1.1  Governance:
Policy Construction （total score: 5.00）

3.00
  • 1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made climate declaration(s)
    2.00
  • 1.1.2 Company has developed corporate carbon neutrality plan and management system
    0.00
  • 1.1.3 Company has incorporated policies regarding supplier energy conservation, emissions reduction, and carbon accounting and reporting into written documents such as the supplier code of conduct
    1.00

1.2  Governance:
Mechanism Construction （total score: 5.00）

5.00
  • 1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risk management procedures
    2.00
  • 1.2.2 Company has integrated climate-related issues into board-level oversight
    1.00
  • 1.2.3 Company offers capacity building and financial incentives, and/or launches innovative projects for suppliers to reduce emissions
    2.00

2.1  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1&2 Emissions （total score: 9.00）

9.00
  • 2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 1&2 emission data
    4.00
  • 2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed comprehensive energy consumption and energy usage by energy types
    2.00
  • 2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed carbon intensity or energy intensity
    2.00
  • 2.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed information on carbon emission trading
    1.00

2.2  Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 Emissions （total score: 6.00）

6.00
  • 2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 3 emissions
    4.00
  • 2.2.2 Company collects supplier carbon emission data on a regular basis
    2.00

2.3  Measurement & Disclosure:
Product Carbon Footprint （total score: 4.00）

0.00
  • 2.3.1 Company has publicly disclosed product carbon footprint
    0.00

3.1  Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 1&2 Targets （total score: 7.00）

6.00
  • 3.1.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets or energy consumption targets
    3.00
  • 3.1.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
    2.00
  • 3.1.3 Company has set and publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
    0.00
  • 3.1.4 Scope 1 & 2 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
    1.00

3.2  Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 3 Targets （total score: 7.00）

4.00
  • 3.2.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 3 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 3.2.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
    0.00
  • 3.2.3 Company has set specific objectives on promoting suppliers to set their own emission reduction targets
    0.00
  • 3.2.4 Scope 3 climate targets are certified or approved by a third party
    1.00

4.1  Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 1&2 Emission Reduction Progress （total score: 7.00）

3.00
  • 4.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made towards its Scope 1 & 2 emissions reduction targets or energy consumption targets
    3.00
  • 4.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
    0.00
  • 4.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its renewable energy target
    0.00

4.2  Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 3 Emission Reduction Progress （total score: 7.00）

3.00
  • 4.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 emission reduction targets
    3.00
  • 4.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
    0.00
  • 4.2.3 Company tracks its suppliers’ target setting progress
    0.00

5.1  Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Company Operation （total score: 12.00）

2.00
  • 5.1.1 Company has conducted non-fossil energy utilization projects and/or green power procurement and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.50
  • 5.1.2 Company has conducted energy monitoring and energy management
    0.00
  • 5.1.3 Company has conducted energy efficiency improvement projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.50
  • 5.1.4 Company has conducted other types of emission reduction projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.00
  • 5.1.5 Company has reduced emissions through carbon offsets, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    1.00
  • 5.1.6 Company has incorporated emission reduction approaches into the product design process
    -

5.2  Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Value Chain （total score: 7.00）

2.50
  • 5.2.1 Company promotes suppliers to conduct corporate greenhouse gas and energy management
    1.00
  • 5.2.2 Company has launched energy saving initiatives and/or low carbon technology innovation initiatives with material suppliers, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    1.00
  • 5.2.3 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with logistics suppliers, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    0.00
  • 5.2.4 Company has published best practices on supply chain carbon management annually
    0.00
  • 5.2.5 Company has established (or coordinated with downstream customers to establish) end-of-life recycling mechanisms to recycle used products
    0.50
  • 5.2.6 Company has promoted suppliers to replace primary production raw materials with recycled materials or lower carbon substitutes, and disclosed associated emission reductions
    -
  • 5.2.7 Company has established (or coordinated with downstream customers to establish) end-of-life recycling mechanisms to recycle used products
    -

5.3  Climate Action:
Affiliated Company Engagement （total score: 8.00）

1.00
  • 5.3.1 Affiliates have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emission at facility level
    1.00
  • 5.3.2 Affiliates have set carbon targets, tracked and public disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    0.00

5.4  Climate Action:
Upstream Supplier Engagement （total score: 16.00）

1.00
  • 5.4.1 Direct suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
    0.50
  • 5.4.2 Direct suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    0.00
  • 5.4.3 Indirect suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
    0.50
  • 5.4.4 Indirect suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
    0.00
  • 5.4.5 Company employs the Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to empower upstream suppliers to manage their supply chain carbon emissions
    0.00
Note:

As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (15%; Indicator 2.3.1 does not apply), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets (14%) and Climate Action (43%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.

Communication Updates

  • required a factory to conduct corrective actions for supervision record(s).
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Lululemon, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.
    Tainan City
     Corrective Actions
    ● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has carried out correction action(s);
    ● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2024/6/29 8:16:05
  • required a factory to disclose its annual GHG emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Lululemon, actively reported and publicly disclosed its GHG emissions data in 2023.
    Jiaxing
     Disclosed Carbon Data
    ● Enterprise has disclosed annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2024/3/7 9:27:15
  • required a factory to report its annual GHG emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Lululemon, actively reported its GHG emissions data in 2023.
    Jiaxing
     Uploaded Carbon Data
    ● Enterprise has uploaded annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2024/3/6 10:11:09
  • required a textile mill to disclose its annual resource use and emissions data.
    This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Lululemon, actively reported its pollutant release and transfer registry (PRTR) data. The factory has reported and publicly disclosed PRTR data in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023.
    Jiaxing
     Disclosed PRTR Data
    ● Enterprise has published annual emissions data;
    ●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.
    Publication Date：2024/3/2 21:55:33
Previous Page 1/4Next Page

Other Industry Brands

Previous Page 1/11Next Page
x
x
Service Authorization

The Enterprise GHG Emission Accounting Platform is jointly developed by the Blue Map and Insblue.
The platform requires access to your account information
(including but not limited to your company name, registered cell phone number and email address)
to enable your use of relevant functions.

If you have any questions, please contact gsc@ipe.org.cn.

Reject Allow
x
Service Authorization

The Enterprise Carbon Accounting and Disclosure Platform is jointly developed by the Blue Map and Insblue.
The platform requires access to your account information
(including but not limited to your company name, registered cell phone number and email address)
to enable your use of relevant functions.

If you have any questions, please contact gsc@ipe.org.cn.

Reject Allow