Subsidiary brands:
Corporate Climate Action CATI
CATI score
9.00
Total Possible Score: 100Total rank
460
Out of 1000 total brandsIndustry rank
7
Out of 82 total brands in the Environment and Waste Management industry
CATI Category Scores Analysis
CATI Category Scores Benchmarking
CATI Category Scores
1.1 Governance:
Pledged Policies
（total score: 5.00）
2.00
-
1.1.1 Company has committed to climate actions and made climate declaration(s)
1.00 -
1.1.2 Company has developed corporate carbon neutrality plan and management system
0.00 -
1.1.3 Company has incorporated supplier carbon data reporting into supplier code of conduct
0.00 -
1.1.4 Company has developed policies to guide low-carbon production and lifestyle, contributing to the transition towards a low-carbon society
1.00
1.2 Governance:
Mechanism Construction
（total score: 5.00）
0.00
-
1.2.1 Company has integrated climate-related issues into its business strategy and has specific climate-related risk management procedures
0.00 -
1.2.2 Company has integrated climate-related issues into board-level oversight
0.00 -
1.2.3 Company employs Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track supplier climate performance
0.00 -
1.2.4 Company offers capacity building and financial incentives, and/or launches innovative projects for suppliers to reduce emissions
0.00
2.1 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 1&2 Emissions
（total score: 10.00）
3.00
-
2.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 1&2 emission data
2.00 -
2.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed carbon intensity
0.00 -
2.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed energy efficiency
0.00 -
2.1.4 Company has publicly disclosed information on carbon emission trading
1.00
2.2 Measurement & Disclosure:
Scope 3 Emissions
（total score: 7.00）
0.00
-
2.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed Scope 3 emissions
0.00 -
2.2.2 Company collects supplier carbon emission data on a regular basis
0.00
3.1 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 1&2 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
0.00
-
3.1.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
0.00 -
3.1.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
3.1.3 Company has set and publicly disclosed its renewable energy target
0.00
3.2 Carbon Targets Setting:
Scope 3 Targets
（total score: 7.00）
0.00
-
3.2.1 Company has set and publicly disclosed its ongoing Scope 3 emission reduction targets
0.00 -
3.2.2 Company has set and publicly disclosed its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
3.2.3 Company has set specific objectives on promoting suppliers (at least those in China) to set their own emission reduction targets
0.00
4.1 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 1&2 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 8.00）
0.00
-
4.1.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 emission reduction targets
0.00 -
4.1.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 1&2 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
4.1.3 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its renewable energy target
0.00
4.2 Performance against Carbon Targets:
Scope 3 Emission Reduction Progress
（total score: 9.00）
0.00
-
4.2.1 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 emission reduction targets
0.00 -
4.2.2 Company has publicly disclosed progress made against its Scope 3 carbon neutrality target
0.00 -
4.2.3 Company employs Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to track its suppliers’ target setting progress
0.00
5.1 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Company Operation
（total score: 12.00）
4.00
-
5.1.1 Company has conducted non-fossil energy utilization projects and/or green power procurement and disclosed associated emission reductions
2.00 -
5.1.2 Company has conducted energy efficiency improvement projects and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.50 -
5.1.3 Company has conducted energy monitoring and energy management (e.g. energy management system certification)
0.50 -
5.1.4 Company has reduced emissions through carbon offsets, and disclosed associated emission reductions (e.g. Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS), Nature-based Solutions (NbS), market-based carbon offset mechanisms)
1.00 -
5.1.5 Company has conducted other types of emission reduction projects and disclosed associated emission reductions (e.g. direct emission reduction from manufacturing process, logistic optimization)
0.00
5.2 Climate Action:
Decarbonization in Value Chain
（total score: 6.00）
0.00
-
5.2.1 Company promotes suppliers to conduct corporate greenhouse gas and energy management (e.g. greenhouse gas accounting, product carbon footprint certification, energy management system certification)
0.00 -
5.2.2 Company has launched emission reduction initiatives with suppliers and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.00 -
5.2.3 Company has published best practices on supply chain carbon management annually
0.00 -
5.2.4 Company has conducted emission reduction projects targeting other emission sources along the value chain and disclosed associated emission reductions
0.00
5.3 Climate Action:
Affiliated Company Engagement
（total score: 8.00）
0.00
-
5.3.1 Affiliates have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emission at facility level
0.00 -
5.3.2 Affiliates have set carbon targets, tracked and public disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00
5.4 Climate Action:
Upstream Supplier Engagement
（total score: 16.00）
0.00
-
5.4.1 Direct suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.2 Direct suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.3 Indirect suppliers have measured and publicly disclosed their carbon emissions at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.4 Indirect suppliers have set carbon targets, tracked and publicly disclosed reduction progress at facility level
0.00 -
5.4.5 Company employs Blue EcoChain or other automated methods to empower upstream suppliers on supply chain carbon management
0.00
Note:
As carbon hotspots vary from industry to industry, a weighting factor applies across four of the five CATI activity areas: Measurement & Disclosure (17%), Carbon Targets Setting (14%), Performance against Carbon Targets(17%) and Climate Action (42%). The default weighting factors for each industry are shown in the CATI Evaluation Guidelines.
Communication Updates
-
required a factory to conduct corrective actions for supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Grandblue, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.Huangshi
Corrective Actions
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has carried out correction action(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/4/12 8:42:19 -
required a factory to conduct an audit for its supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Grandblue, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and underwent a third-party audit to verify the effectiveness of its corrective actions.Fuzhou
Audit
● Rectification progress:Enterprise with supervisions has demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions via third party audits;
●Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/1/30 11:12:41 -
required a environmental company to conduct corrective actions for wastewater supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Grandblue, actively communicated with environmental groups to implement corrective actions for its supervision record(s) , and disclosed information on the status of its corrective actions.Fuzhou
Wastewater
● Environmental violation issue: Industrial wastewater pollution;
● Potential impact on: water quality, river ecology, public health. Corrective Actions
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has carried out correction action(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/1/20 21:16:07 -
required a factory to issue an explanation for supervision record(s).This factory, through motivation from its stakeholder Grandblue, actively communicated with environmental groups to issue an explanation for its supervision record(s) .Huangshi
Explanation
● Rectification progress: Enterprise with supervisions has issued public explanation(s);
● Driving force: Stakeholders and environmentally conscious consumers.Publication Date：2023/1/9 13:41:19
